Get a Quote

[email protected]
Drop us a line

Best Reasons to Reduce Your Reactive Maintenance

For several business leaders, it is not always obvious to invest in predictive maintenance strategies and tools– particularly in the event of an upfront investment already when asset replacement or failure are necessary. Even so, a reactive service plan which waits unless an asset breakdown can simply increase your maintenance and repair costs over the long term.

While reactive maintenance does not require early investment, and hence short-term savings, for asset owners, the strategy is increasingly expensive. Here have been four ways that your business money costs now that this outdated maintenance paradigm.

Reason 1: More the Damage of Equipment the Greater will be the Cost for Repairing

You can put your materials at risk of significant harm if you let your assets operate to a failure point before you fix them. What usually happens is that a particular component or subassembly begins to dress up due to unreasonable ecosystem, inappropriate operation, a fault in the manufacturer, or routine wear & tear.

Unpaired and Uncontrolled, the domino effect, including its failures, can result in a single part that weakens the asset in its entirety. The entire device could be pushed up by a broken piston during an engine. A fan that operates at a less optimal level can overheat the whole asset.

If you depend on reactive maintenance, you never will capture such information as well, as harm to your property would be significantly higher than when the problem had already been caught from its initial stages. This will, of course, require you to pay as much for repair work; since a breakdown is not planned, you can charge a premium for the early supply of replacement parts and increase worker’s wages for just about any additional time your maintenance staff has incurred.

Reason 2: Planning and Scheduling Properly Becomes More Difficult

While you have a reactive maintenance ecosystem, you bet mostly on the health of your asset, even if you seem to have no evidence to support the optimum uptime reliability. When you have a planned manufacturing process as well as a critical asset breaks down, everything is safeguarded during these unplanned repairs. If you cannot plan for and plan for yourself, a few of your other strategic steps could positively affect you.

There was a significant change between labor-intensive & capital-intensive activities in industries from natural gas and oil to life sciences as well as industrial manufacturing. Basically, companies now rely heavily more now than ever on their physical assets. Downtime could therefore be catastrophic if such a piece of necessary production machinery is inadvertently and for an extended amount of time knocked offline.

Reason 3: Disagreement with Laws is Costly

Based on the severity of its transgressions, failing to comply with safety, quality as well as environmental standards may negatively affect the financial outcomes of a corporation. An asset that performs at the lowest possible level could have a negative effect on the product’s quality, leading to fines in highly regulated industries, including the automotive or pharmaceutical industries.

Furthermore, an under-performing piece of equipment may jeopardize employees’ safety. An asset exhibiting excessive vibration, for instance, can cause the operator’s musculoskeletal injury and can send waste to fly. In many other cases, an overheating machine can present a fire hazard or cause a fire when it is affected. Undermine action can lead to personal injury or death, litigation, and an effect on production until another asset reaches the tipping point.

Reason 4: Reduction in Assets Life

The objective of company asset management as well as predictive maintenance would be to achieve maximum physical assets’ lifetime value at such a reasonable cost. This means that all parts of the asset life cycle, from operation, design, upkeep, as well, as disposal, should be made to make the most of all the assets.

To achieve this objective, a predictive maintenance strategy is critical since it enables you to carry out maintenance so if costs are lesser for you. If your maintenance – which preventive maintenance may well be done on such a fixed schedule rather than on a situation for the property – is pointless, you would then incur labor and material expenses which you may not even have to incur. But on the other side, it is also very costly to allow the asset to fail entirely but instead perform reactive maintenance.

Predictive maintenance helps you keep when it is vital to the cost-effectiveness and health of the asset.

Benefits of Reducing Reactive Maintenance

Increase Life of the Assets

Productors invest significant sums of money in their tangible assets. Maximization production requires the optimized operation of equipment as well as its service life. The lifespan would be shortened if equipment also isn’t properly maintained. It is a learning opportunity which we all who have cars probably fully understand. We understand that we’ll have an automobile in which we never modify oil or consider replacing the hoses, filters, as well as tires; our vehicle will wear out within a shorter timeframe than one that has been appropriately managed. The frequent interval of an oil change is an illustration of preventive maintenance for just a vehicle. Industrial fabricators are comparable in that they need regular care in order to maximize their lifetime.

These normal maintenance activities are not intrinsically encouraged by reactive maintenance programs, as equipment cannot work best and tends to take a longer life.

Reduces Cost for Maintenance 

Many manufacturers make the argument that a reactive maintenance strategy is cheaper than preventive maintenance. The whole argument must bear the cost of downtime for just a real comparison.

From organizational asset performance: an excellent route to Operational Excellence, “The price of unexpected downtime for industrial plants may be devastating from 10000 USD to 250000 USD for every hour.”

The price of a single downtime event could perhaps easily be worth 100000 USD per hour — that could help finance a preventive maintenance program. Reactive maintenance frequently leads to overtime, accelerated parts, and other contributors, which would significantly increase costs over preventative maintenance throughout the reactive maintenance scenario.

So these were some of the reasons to reduce reactive maintenance and start utilizing predictive or preventive maintenance.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *